|
Non-native invasive species - biological invaders - have garnered
extensive social, philosophical, management and scientific interest due
to their ability to impact and alter natural and even human communities.
How should we as a society cope with biological invasions? Current
management solutions to biological invasion problems run the gamut from
the use of chemicals to attempt to eradicate invasive species to the
decision to do nothing at all. When nothing is done, native ecosystems
are often altered and degraded.
Legal and economic reactions to biological invasions include the
creation of laws that are difficult to enforce and the appropriation of
large sums of money to attempt to control or eradicate the invader.
Unfortunately, control and eradication of organisms that have already
established large populations are often extremely difficult, if not
impossible.
The Lake Davis pike scenario illustrates that even when the technical
solution to an invasive species is relatively straightforward, coping
with an invader also requires the buy-in of local communities, and
often, involving stakeholders directly in the decision-making process.
People have the power to affect or facilitate biological invasions.
They can do this in countless ways: people can move non-native species like
fish into new environments, where the new species have no natural enemies
and so can spread out-of-control. People can also modify the environment
by building dams and imposing other large scale alterations which impact
the ability of native species to survive and may favor non-native
invaders.
People can also help to stop invasions. They have the power to change
attitudes within their community so that introducing new species is not
acceptable. They can even eradicate invasive species, even at the
grasroots level, as is happening in the 20 year long project to
hand-pull spotted knapweed by the Salmon River Restoration Council. The
punchline is that people are learning to cope with the
ramifications of their actions, either weathering economic losses and the
loss of native species they have come to value, or pulling together to
combat this growing threat.
|
|